| 
   
 
 
 
  
  
  
  
  
 |  | 
 Another terrorist explosion! A sign of a Lebanese power 
struggle? 
 
ReformLebanon.com - July 12, 2005 
 
Whilst London is recovering after its own taste of terrorism, the chaos in 
Lebanon continues. Britain has already named several suspects on its list after 
five days, and yet after five months of bombings and assassinations in Lebanon, 
we have yet to see a single suspect named. These attacks are calculated and co-ordinated, 
which suggest that something greater is brewing beneath the surface of Lebanon's 
shabby political stage. 
 
We have heard many theories pointing to foreign powers, including prime suspect 
Syria. The previous two assassinated Lebanese were said to be loud anti-Syrian 
voices, leading to theories of revenge attacks by Damascus. However, considering 
that Syria has been under increasing US and European pressure in the past 
months, the Syrians have seemed to be heeding to threats of "regime change" by 
the US. Syria has pushed for greater co-operation in Iraq with a Syrian embassy 
set to open in Baghdad within months, have begun to co-operate in Palestine by 
supporting a "national unity government", as well as attempting to mend ties 
with pro-American Arab states in the region. These trends only suggest that the 
Syrians are attempting at least to dodge the American spotlight, which renders 
their hand in Lebanon's terrorist carnage quite out of the ordinary. Now that 
pro-Syrian figure, Elias el Murr, has been the target of an assassination 
attempt, doubts regarding Syria's hand in the terrorism in Lebanon grow. 
 
There have also been theories pointing at the US and Israel, allegedly trying to 
cause instability in Lebanon. However, if instability and chaos in Lebanon were 
indeed what the terrorists were seeking to create, then high-profile and 
controversial figures with wide public support would have had a greater effect.
 
 
These string of attacks fail to make any sense. Various leaders and figures have 
been targeted without any specific reason, in addition to smaller bombs planted 
in areas at quiet times. Obviously the bombers have avoided causing heavy 
civilian casualties, or extensive infrastructure damage. 
 
One possibility is an attempt to scare the Lebanese public, but to what end 
would that bring? 
 
Therefore, we must look at another possibility that the Lebanese have failed to 
explore ... the possibility of an internal power struggle in Lebanon. It has 
been thirty years since the Lebanese have been given the responsibility to 
govern their own country, and within those thirty years we witnessed a 
destructive civil war coupled by foreign domination. The various factions are 
struggling to adjust and come to terms with their newfound responsibilities, and 
many of these factions are failing to present a national agenda. Instead, as 
they were thirty years ago, the factions seem to be representing their own 
interests. As they squabble for positions to fill the power vacuum, then perhaps 
we shouldn't rule out the possibility that this power struggle has extended to 
violent means. Considering that every investigation into each bomb has resulted 
in absolutely nothing, one can only wonder whether these investigations ever had 
the intention of producing answers. 
  
 |